Return-Path: <ericruttan@chartermi.net>
Received: from front4.chartermi.net ([24.213.60.106] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2)
  with ESMTP id 753687 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:23:59 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.213.60.106; envelope-from=ericruttan@chartermi.net
X-Virus-Scanned: by cgpav
Received: from [24.236.229.73] (HELO [192.168.2.2])
  by front4.chartermi.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.6)
  with ESMTP id 58090687 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:23:12 -0500
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.0.300 [266.1.0]); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:31:15 -0500
Message-ID: <006601c5188e$f6a4b820$0202a8c0@eric>
From: "Eric Ruttan" <ericruttan@chartermi.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-753694@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Vapor Lock
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:31:15 -0500
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1478
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478

The toyota prius uses a bladder in the tank and has no vent.  I imagine a
few others may do the same.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "William" <wschertz@ispwest.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 10:18 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Vapor Lock


MessageI believe cars vent through a charcoal absorber. May allow slight
pressurization, but not much.
Bill Schertz
KIS Cruiser # 4045
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Russell Duffy
  To: Rotary motors in aircraft
  Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 6:04 PM
  Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Vapor Lock


  There is a third option.
  Seal the vent when not flying.

  I would not recommend this for RV wing tanks.
  Makes me wonder about cars.  Aren't those tanks sealed, or at least sealed
to some pressure?