Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #17621
From: Paul <sqpilot@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: No more vapor lock
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 20:01:09 -0600
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Hi, Kelly....I wish I had only made and tested one modification at a time.  I don't know for sure if it was bypassing of the Facet pump or installing the vent in the sump tank that made the difference.  I may reconnect the Facet pump and try one more time to see if I can induce vapor lock.  My thinking is that I should have seen bubbles in the clear fuel line that I used to bypass the Facet, trying to work their way back to the main tanks. I could see nothing, unless they were so miniscule that the naked eye could not see them. We did, however see movement of air/bubbles from the top of the sump tank going into the main fuel tank.  Most of the time, the small amount of fuel in the newly installed sump tank vent line just stayed about halfway between the sump tank and the main tank. Under higher power loading, the fuel/bubbles would start drifting uphill toward the main fuel tank.
    Prior to installing the vent and bypassing the Facet pump, I could easily and repeatedly induce vapor lock.  If I either plug the sump or reconnect the Facet, one of those should let me induce vapor lock again.  At least that's the assumption I am making, (and we all know about making assumptions).  I think that un-doing these mods one at a time would be the most scientific method of finding out which one was actually the cure.  If you take both Excedrin and Aspirin for a headache, it's difficult to know which one cured the headache. Paul Conner
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 7:30 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: No more vapor lock

Paul,
    Does this mean the Facet fuel pump is history ??
--
Kelly Troyer
Dyke Delta/13B/RD1C/EC2




-------------- Original message from "Paul" <sqpilot@bellsouth.net>: --------------

Well, after several mods to my airplane, which include installing firesleeve on all fuel lines, installing a vent for the sump tank (into the main wing tank) and bypassing the Facet fuel pump with a short length of clear tubing, I ran the engine until the water temp hit 230 degrees.  I shut it down and let the heat soaking proceed.  Then I restarted the engine and ran it up to 240 degrees. Still was able to go to full power with no signs of the engine stumbling or running rough.  Finally, temps hit 250 and I could hear the surge tank spitting out steam and liquid, but WOT was still smooth.  Previously it would stumble and quit by the time I hit 230.  I taxiied back in and temps only came down to around 220, so we placed the fan under the NACA scoop to cool it down.  There was evidence of small bubbles coming out of the top of the aluminum sump tank (which remained cool to the touch even at 250 degrees water temp), going into the left fuel strake. Itwas a small amount, but nevertheless, it was evident that the vent was working. There was no evidence of any bubbles coming out of the bottom of the surge tank and trying to work their way back up towards the fuel selector valve (through the line that the Facet pump normally resides).  I ran it again today, but just to normal 180 degree temps, and it still ran fine.  Paul Conner


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.1.0 - Release Date: 2/18/2005
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.1.0 - Release Date: 2/18/2005
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster