Return-Path: Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 753235 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:27:30 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.102.122.149; envelope-from=echristl@cisco.com Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (64.102.124.12) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Feb 2005 15:26:45 -0500 X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Received: from [172.18.179.151] (echristl-linux.cisco.com [172.18.179.151]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j1LKQh1j012413 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:26:43 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <421A4403.5090401@cisco.com> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:26:43 -0500 From: Ernest Christley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040929 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: 2nd battery Re: Amps required to run engine & amp- hours available References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bob White wrote: >Hi Ernest, > >I would like more solid info on whether the gears are really >robust enough to handle the load. > > > The alternator that is 80% efficient and is pushing 50A requires just about 1Hp. What I've seen of the gears, unless they're made of pot metal, I don't see how they couldn't be stout enough. I haven't rebuilt my engine yet, so I'm going off drawings (probably not to scale), and measuring the gear on the CAS. I think I calculated the torque at considerably less than 10in.lb., but I'd have to find the napkin that I calculated that out on 8*) >PS: If you are doing 4 things at once you're doing better than me. :) > > Ernest (doing 4 things at once == working on 1 thing while 3 more get in the way)