Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.101] (HELO ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 752733 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:14:29 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.101; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-024-074-185-127.carolina.rr.com [24.74.185.127]) by ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id j1LHDeee027256 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:13:42 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <000601c51838$b765bb60$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: PSRU - hub/prop end Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:13:49 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Ernest, I think you might be referring to the time Tracy received some drive shafts which had not been manufactured correctly. Wasn't an incompatibility problem it was failure in manufacturing and quality control. Ed A ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ernest Christley" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 10:49 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: PSRU - hub/prop end > Tracy Crook wrote: > > > Ernest, > > I'm not sure what problem you are referring to. I do not recall > > anything relating to gear compatibility in my development. > > > > Tracy > > Tracy, > I could very well have read it somewhere else. I thought I remembered a > picture from your website where you were shining a light through a gear > set to show how the teeth were not meshing completely. The condition > was given as the root cause for premature failure of some gears. I > could very well have seen that someplace else. > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >