Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao11.cox.net ([68.230.241.28] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 750544 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 13:32:43 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.28; envelope-from=daveleonard@cox.net Received: from davidandanne ([68.101.147.215]) by fed1rmmtao11.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-117-20041022) with SMTP id <20050219183159.MJHS20009.fed1rmmtao11.cox.net@davidandanne> for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 13:31:59 -0500 From: "DaveLeonard" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Drain removal? Re: Water in the fuel Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 10:32:06 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Importance: Normal To be honest, one of the big factors in owning you own plane, that is kept in a hangar, is to be able to cut down on pre-flight. Draining the fuel with the current high-flow system in place I saw as a useless chore. External pre-flight is now down to checking the tires, checking the flap actuators and control movement. I took the drains out because they stick out into the airstream and I was not using them. I put in aluminum plugs instead. It is a simple matter to switch back. Dave Leonard > > > Dave L wrote: > > I think I will still do the experiment, but maybe the drain plugs > are going back > in reguardless of the result. > ------------------------------------- > Dave, what was the rational for removing the plugs?? > > Bernie > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >