Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao10.cox.net ([68.230.241.29] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 750353 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 11:19:34 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.29; envelope-from=daveleonard@cox.net Received: from smtp.west.cox.net ([172.18.180.57]) by fed1rmmtao10.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-117-20041022) with SMTP id <20050219161847.KGBF510.fed1rmmtao10.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net> for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 11:18:47 -0500 X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.15 (webedge20-101-1103-20040528) From: To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Water in the fuel Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 11:18:49 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20050219161847.KGBF510.fed1rmmtao10.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net> It only takes about 10 seconds for me to fully prime my fuel system. ie, Water in the tank will hit the engine within 5 seconds, then most of it will be back in the tank in another 5 seconds. Dave Leonard > Takeoff is the critical point. Something I have never seen discussed is > knowing how long it takes for water to effect your engine. It would seem > that one could introduce water in the fuel and run the engine up, and time > how long till the engine sees it. Assuming this was well known one would > think that run ups on the ground for a longer period than this would be > excellent prevention. > > Eric Ruttan > >