Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.102] (HELO ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1) with ESMTP id 745389 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 23:35:25 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.102; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-024-074-185-127.carolina.rr.com [24.74.185.127]) by ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id j1J4Yakd024101 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 23:34:37 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <000f01c5163c$55962800$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Digital Fuel Monitoring System Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 23:34:43 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Ok, folks I got the message on showing resistor "legs" - too risqué for some folks I guess {:>). Seriously, I think I will redesign the board to use Surface mount resistors and capacitors and that will eliminate legs - of course it was sure nice to use those legs to leap over traces. Thanks for the input, Finn, Todd, Charlie, et al Ed ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charlie England" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 10:46 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Digital Fuel Monitoring System > Hey Ed, want a 2nd opinion? What Finn said. > > Same reason that 13B through-bolts break. > > Charlie > > > Finn Lassen wrote: > > > Hi Ed. > > > > This of course all only applies to electronics in a vibration exposed > > environment. > > Good practice, as I was taught it many years ago, is to have hole > > spacings to allow components to lie flat on the board. > > Of course there are exceptions like power resistors that need airflow > > around them, but they should be mounted with "stand-offs" (small tubes > > on their legs). The rule used to be that components should not be held > > in place by the solder, but by their mechanical mounting. That's why > > the pins are typically bent 45 degrees where they stick through the > > PCB before being cut off and soldered. Heavy components are > > additionally secured with some kind of mechanical fastener or globs of > > goo (technical term). Now obviously the weight of the body of the > > component in relationship to number of pins/legs is a factor. An > > example would be an IC with oodles (another technical term) of pins. > > > > I "grew up" in a company that secialized in sound and vibration. It > > was very educational to watch a PCB board mounted on a "shaker" > > (basically a loudspeaker where there membrame was replaced with a > > mounting place) lit with a strobe light synchronized to the frequency > > sweep. Components dancing around and finally falling off if not > > properly supported (mounted). > > > > But that was then. Now we have surface mounted components which I know > > nothing about... > > > > > > Finn (Looks like I've been kicked off the list again) > > > > > > Geez, Finn, I was unaware that there was a "protocol" for resistor > > sizes on PC boards. Seriously, is there some reason (vibration?) for > > forcing resistors all the way to the board or is it just "esthetics?". > > > > Ed A > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >