Return-Path: Received: from email2k3.itlnet.net ([64.19.112.12] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1) with ESMTP id 745339 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 22:36:42 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.19.112.12; envelope-from=jwvoto@itlnet.net Received: from rav.itlnet.net (unverified [192.168.10.149]) by itlnet.net (Rockliffe SMTPRA 6.1.17) with SMTP id for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 21:35:57 -0600 Received: from JWVOTO (unverified [64.19.116.43]) by itlnet.net (Rockliffe SMTPRA 6.1.17) with SMTP id for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 21:35:55 -0600 Message-ID: <016e01c51634$939ede60$3a721340@JWVOTO> From: "Wendell Voto" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Amps required to run engine & amp- hours available Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 21:38:28 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0167_01C51602.2F726920" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0167_01C51602.2F726920 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Bob, I guess I overlooked that info on their site. Wendell >=20 > Hi Wendell, >=20 > from http://www.odysseybatteries.com/specs.htm the weights are: >=20 > 680 - 14.5 lbs > 680MJ - 15.4 lbs > 625 - 13.2 lbs >=20 > So it appears the 625 is at least a pound lighter. I will say that = the > 680 is a nice red color but the 625 is an ugly black. >=20 > Bob White >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:57:23 -0600 > "Wendell Voto" wrote: >=20 > > Bernie, > > Now that is the kind of information I've been looking for. What = starter are you using in this test? > > No one agreed on disagreed with my assumption that the PC625 = battery would be the one to choose if it weights less than the PC680. = According to the charts the PC625 has 3 minutes more reserve than the = PC680 but a little less in the cranking amps. Your measurements = reinforce my belief. Am I wrong?? Anyone have the weights of these = batteries? > > Wendell >=20 > --=20 > http://www.bob-white.com > N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 (real soon) >=20 > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html ------=_NextPart_000_0167_01C51602.2F726920 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks Bob, I guess I overlooked that info on = their=20 site.

Wendell

>
> Hi = Wendell,
>=20
> from http://www.odysseybatt= eries.com/specs.htm=20 the weights are:
>
> 680     - 14.5 = lbs
>=20 680MJ - 15.4 lbs
> 625    - 13.2 lbs
> =
> So it=20 appears the 625 is at least a pound lighter. I will say that = the
>=20 680 is a nice red color but the 625 is an ugly black.
>
> = Bob=20 White
>
>
>
> On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:57:23=20 -0600
> "Wendell Voto" <jwvoto@itlnet.net> = wrote:
>=20
> > Bernie,
> > Now that is the kind of information = I've been=20 looking for. What starter are you using in this test?
> = >  =20 No one agreed on disagreed with my assumption that the PC625 battery = would be=20 the one to choose if it weights less than the PC680. According to the = charts the=20 PC625 has 3 minutes more reserve than the PC680 but a little less in the = cranking amps. Your measurements reinforce my belief. Am I wrong?? = Anyone=20 have the weights of these batteries?
> > Wendell
> =
> --=20
> http://www.bob-white.com
>=20 N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 (real soon)
>
> >> =20 Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
> = >> Archive:   http://lancai= ronline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html ------=_NextPart_000_0167_01C51602.2F726920--