Return-Path: <canarder@frontiernet.net>
Received: from relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.166] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1)
  with ESMTP id 741413 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:42:31 -0500
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.133.182.166; envelope-from=canarder@frontiernet.net
Received: from filter07.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter07.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.74])
	by relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C7CE358027
	for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:41:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.166])
	by filter07.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter07.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.74]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with LMTP id 31387-39-92 for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>;
	Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:41:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (67-137-75-55.dsl2.cok.tn.frontiernet.net [67.137.75.55])
	by relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E8935810C
	for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:41:44 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <421369B2.7070405@frontiernet.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:41:38 -0600
From: Jim Sower <canarder@frontiernet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040514
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Fuel System Design - Jet Pump
References: <list-741279@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-741279@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0507-0, 02/15/2005), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20040701 (2.0) at filter07.roc.ny.frontiernet.net

I knew that.  I had one that failed.  I meant for fuel transfer.  What 
effect would the back pressure from pushing the fuel through the venturi 
have on the regulator?  Has anyone quantified the back pressure from the 
venturi?  Seems like a lot of extra plumbing associated with jet pump 
that "should" gravity feed stuff back and forth because you can't turn 
the damned thing off.

Where is the point of diminishing return? ... Jim S.

William wrote:

> "PS  Has anyone actually *seen* the two-line-jet-pump and watched it 
> actually WORK ??
> (the devil made me say that )"
>  
> Probably 90% of shallow well water pumps are 'jet pumps'.
> Bill Schertz
> KIS Cruiser # 4045
>
>      
>