Return-Path: Received: from relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.165] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1) with ESMTP id 741078 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 01:40:20 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.133.182.165; envelope-from=canarder@frontiernet.net Received: from filter01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.68]) by relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D74A37036B for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 06:39:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.165]) by filter01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.68]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 20264-24-100 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 06:39:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (67-137-75-55.dsl2.cok.tn.frontiernet.net [67.137.75.55]) by relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9927B370082 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 06:39:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4212EAA0.6070900@frontiernet.net> Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 00:39:28 -0600 From: Jim Sower User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040514 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Vapor Lock References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000000090902080303010500" X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0507-0, 02/15/2005), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20040701 (2.0) at filter01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000000090902080303010500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Marvin Kaye wrote: > Hi Paul, > > The system I described in my prior post was one that didn't include a > sump or header tank... fuel flow was direct from the wing tanks. > Component sequence was as follows: > wing tanks > shutoff ball valves > fuel filters > HP fuel pumps > > secondary bypass circuits > fuel selector > fuel pressure transducer > > fluel flow transducers > firewall penetration > T to split flow to > fuel rails > fuel rails > FP regulator > return through fuel selector > to selected tank I have a canard, but I will have a Facet pump near (and below) the wing tanks to PUSH the fuel through the filter and fuel flow transducer. I don't want the HP pumps to SUCK through the filters and etc. for fear of vaporizing the fuel. > > The shutoff ball valves are hidden in the wing root fairings and allow > flow from the tanks to be disabled to make it possible to remove & > service the filters and pumps without having to drain the tanks. > Their handles are oriented so that they cannot be closed when their > access panels are installed. > > If your "sump" tank is truly a sump, I don't understand the need for > the Facet boost pump... the sump should be fed by gravity from the > mains. If it needs to have fuel pumped up to it then it's a header. > > > > > > "Paul" wrote: > > I'm a little confused...I have both. I have a facet low pressure > boost pump > between the fuel selector and sump tank, and two high pressure EFI > pumps after > the sump tank, before the engine. Paul Conner > ----- Original Message ----- > From: WRJJRS@aol.com > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 2:15 PM > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Vapor Lock > > > In a message dated 2/13/2005 10:09:15 AM Pacific Standard Time, > marv@lancaironline.net writes: > > > Other folks have reported fuel flow problems when they located > their pumps > between the engine and fuel selector instead of between the fuel > selector > and > tanks... mostly the cause was air being sucked past the fuel > selector's > seals > causing some air to be introduced into the fuel flow. > > > Good Point Marv, > Bill Jepson > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.7 - Release Date: 2/10/2005 > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >> > > --------------000000090902080303010500 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit  Marvin Kaye wrote:
Hi Paul,

The system I described in my prior post was one that didn't include a sump or header tank... fuel flow was direct from the wing tanks.  Component sequence was as follows:
wing tanks > shutoff ball valves > fuel filters > HP fuel pumps > secondary bypass circuits > fuel selector > fuel pressure transducer > fluel flow transducers > firewall penetration > T to split flow to fuel rails > fuel rails > FP regulator > return through fuel selector to selected tank
I have a canard, but I will have a Facet pump near (and below) the wing tanks to PUSH the fuel through the filter and fuel flow transducer.  I don't want the HP pumps to SUCK through the filters and etc. for fear of vaporizing the fuel.

The shutoff ball valves are hidden in the wing root fairings and allow flow from the tanks to be disabled to make it possible to remove & service the filters and pumps without having to drain the tanks.  Their handles are oriented so that they cannot be closed when their access panels are installed.

If your "sump" tank is truly a sump, I don't understand the need for the Facet boost pump... the sump should be fed by gravity from the mains.  If it needs to have fuel pumped up to it then it's a header.

  <marv>



"Paul" <sqpilot@bellsouth.net> wrote:

 I'm a little confused...I have both.  I have a facet low pressure boost pump
between the fuel selector and sump tank, and two high pressure EFI pumps after
the sump tank, before the engine.  Paul Conner
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: WRJJRS@aol.com
  To: Rotary motors in aircraft
  Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 2:15 PM
  Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Vapor Lock
 
 
  In a message dated 2/13/2005 10:09:15 AM Pacific Standard Time,
marv@lancaironline.net writes:
 
 
    Other folks have reported fuel flow problems when they located their pumps
    between the engine and fuel selector instead of between the fuel selector
and
    tanks... mostly the cause was air being sucked past the fuel selector's
seals
    causing some air to be introduced into the fuel flow.
 
 
  Good Point Marv,
  Bill Jepson
 
 
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
  Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.7 - Release Date: 2/10/2005

 Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
 Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html


--------------000000090902080303010500--