Return-Path: Received: from imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.70] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1) with ESMTP id 740963 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 22:24:55 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.70; envelope-from=sqpilot@bellsouth.net Received: from [216.78.115.119] by imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050216032407.VFHI730.imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net@[216.78.115.119]> for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 22:24:07 -0500 Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.0.300 [265.8.8]); Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:24:00 -0600 Message-ID: <01f801c513d6$f455cd00$77734ed8@paul52u7f5qyav> From: "Paul" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Vapor Lock Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:23:59 -0600 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=response Hi, Marv....sorry, I saw only part of the message (cut) and it was out of context. Regarding my surge tank, yes it is gravity fed, however when doing aerobatics, I like the warm fuzzy feeling I get when I switch on the facet fuel pump. Paul Conner ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marvin Kaye" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 8:50 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Vapor Lock > Hi Paul, > > The system I described in my prior post was one that didn't include a sump > or header tank... fuel flow was direct from the wing tanks. Component > sequence was as follows: > wing tanks > shutoff ball valves > fuel filters > HP fuel pumps > > secondary bypass circuits > fuel selector > fuel pressure transducer > > fluel flow transducers > firewall penetration > T to split flow to fuel > rails > fuel rails > FP regulator > return through fuel selector to > selected tank > > The shutoff ball valves are hidden in the wing root fairings and allow > flow from the tanks to be disabled to make it possible to remove & service > the filters and pumps without having to drain the tanks. Their handles > are oriented so that they cannot be closed when their access panels are > installed. > > If your "sump" tank is truly a sump, I don't understand the need for the > Facet boost pump... the sump should be fed by gravity from the mains. If > it needs to have fuel pumped up to it then it's a header. > > > > > > "Paul" wrote: > > I'm a little confused...I have both. I have a facet low pressure boost > pump > between the fuel selector and sump tank, and two high pressure EFI pumps > after > the sump tank, before the engine. Paul Conner > ----- Original Message ----- > From: WRJJRS@aol.com > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 2:15 PM > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Vapor Lock > In a message dated 2/13/2005 10:09:15 AM Pacific Standard Time, > marv@lancaironline.net writes: > Other folks have reported fuel flow problems when they located their > pumps > between the engine and fuel selector instead of between the fuel > selector > and > tanks... mostly the cause was air being sucked past the fuel > selector's > seals > causing some air to be introduced into the fuel flow. > Good Point Marv, > Bill Jepson > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.7 - Release Date: 2/10/2005 > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.8 - Release Date: 2/14/2005 > > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.8 - Release Date: 2/14/2005