Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.102] (HELO ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1) with ESMTP id 740779 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:23:43 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.102; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-024-074-185-127.carolina.rr.com [24.74.185.127]) by ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id j1G0Mukd012559 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:22:57 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <000601c513bd$b1cf0b90$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Atmospheric Pressure Reg wasRe: [FlyRotary] Re: Fuel System Design - Jet Pump Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:23:07 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine I don't think so, Ernest. Remember the pressure regulator is attempting to keep the pressure differential between manifold pressure and fuel rail pressure constant across the injectors - so that the same amount of fuel will be injected for each ms of injector open time. The only thing the atmosphere does is set the upper limit of manifold pressure that the sensor will see. You can still get 12 " HG at altitude with the throttle closed, you just can't get 29.92 (unless with boost of course). Ed A > On another topic, looking at the pages on fuel pressure regulators. > They mention 3 types. The one we've been discussing, wherein the fuel > rail pressure referenced to the manifold, a constant pressure type, that > is just reference to a spring, and the one I found intriguing, the > atmospheric referenced type. > > It seems like the atmospheric type would work best for an airplane. > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >