Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #17238
From: Tom <tomtugan@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Big Butterflies, was: Bruce Turrentine Intake
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:11:27 -0800 (PST)
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
That's a good point Ernest.  Now I need to find something published that speaks to effects of a thinner atmosphere on throttle-body size.
 


Ernest Christley <echristl@cisco.com> wrote:
Tom wrote:

>
> At this website they said....
> "If the air valve is too big, you don't control the air flow. For
> example, a smaller displacement engine will only flow X


snip

> " The rule of thumb for naturally aspirated fuel injection, at a
> standard 1.5 inches of water column, is that for every square inch of
> butterfly, you will flow 140 CFM.


Tom, I think the second statement is more important than the first.
Specifically "1.5 inches of water column". If you drop that standard to
.5", you will have more power. The throttle will lose responsiveness
and control, but except for formation flying, I don't think there is any
need in an airplane for the type of throttle control a car generally
has. I'd gladly accept a few more ponies for the ability to perfectly
trim for 180kts vs 181kts. 8*)

>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html


Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster