Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.100] (HELO ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1) with ESMTP id 729161 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:38:39 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.100; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-024-074-185-127.carolina.rr.com [24.74.185.127]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id j1F3bobp016344 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:37:51 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <003101c5130f$c0b98cb0$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Bruce Turrentine Intake Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:38:02 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Comment, Hell! Put it on the engine and see what she does! {:>). We are certainly all very interested in the performance you achieve with it Bob. Right now it looks like it should function well - but, you know, looks don't always tell the story. However, from what little I understand about intakes it looks like it adheres to some fundamentals of using plenums to maintain a higher air density for the inlets.\ Glad you got it - onward!! Ed A ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob White" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 9:52 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Bruce Turrentine Intake > > Many months of waiting has finally paid off. I received my Turrentine > Intake manifold this evening. > > I'm going to need to do a little work to it. The throttle body is a > Nissan and it looks like some extra stuff was removed. That's OK, but > the return spring is still on it and it closes the throttle, so that > will have to be rearranged. > > There is a small port on the side that is about 1/2 closed off when the > throttle plate is closed. As soon as the plate opens a little, the port > is behind the plate. This doesn't seem to me to be a good location for > either the EC2 sensor, or a reference for the fuel regulator. Shouldn't > both of those be completely behind the throttle plate at all times? I'm > thinking that I should drill a couple of ports right behind the throttle > body. One for the EC2 and one for the fuel regulator. > > Any comments or opinions would be appreciated. > > One note: Bruce has told me that he isn't going to make any more like > this. He is going to replace the aluminum plenum with a laid up plenum. > The runners and flange will remain aluminum. This is to reduce the time > required to build it. > > Bob White > > -- > http://www.bob-white.com > N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 (soon) > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >