Return-Path: Received: from relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.167] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1) with ESMTP id 728274 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:08:28 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.133.182.167; envelope-from=canarder@frontiernet.net Received: from filter04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.71]) by relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AAD0358154 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:07:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.167]) by filter04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 11042-105-61 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:07:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (67-137-75-55.dsl2.cok.tn.frontiernet.net [67.137.75.55]) by relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB88D3580CB for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:07:40 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4210CCC9.9020905@frontiernet.net> Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:07:37 -0600 From: Jim Sower User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040514 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Satellite Internet - WAS: Bellsouth test References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0506-1, 02/11/2005), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20040701 (2.0) at filter04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net I'm waiting for wireless that will reach out the same 5 kliks from the station as DSL. Sadly, where I live, cable and DSL only arrived the last year or two. Jack Beale wrote: > R, > > I have the DirecWay satellite Internet service, and have for about > two years. I also continually monitor the upload/download speeds, so > have some understanding of how well it works. > > DSL speed is usually 350,000 b/s (/0.3 Mb/s/) in either > direction. Cable is variable, but generally will provide 1.2 Mb/s, > unless you happen to live in a neighborhood where cable use is very > high. In that case, your bandwidth will be limited by your neighbors > use of the cable. > > Satellite is fast on download, but slow to upload. > > If you average-out the satellite download speeds, it's about 1 to > 1.2 Mb/s. I've seen it vary from zero to 4 Mb/s - it's a very > "saw-toothed" type of connection. Rather than being a steady 1.2 Mb/s > connection the graph shows a lot of variation during any download > session. As I said, though, it's about 1 Mb/s average. > > Uploads, on the other hand are limited to about 64 Kb/s. This is > quite slow and can be a big problem if you try to upload large graphic > files. > > Here, in this area, cable and DSL are (/currently/) non-existent.... > > Jack Beale > jack.beale@att.net > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Russell Duffy > *To:* Rotary motors in aircraft > *Sent:* Monday, February 14, 2005 12:28 AM > *Subject:* [FlyRotary] Re: Bellsouth test > > Unfortunately, I can't find my satellite dish....The hurricane removed > it. Paul Conner > > Call your insurance company. They have a new one for you :-) > > I've never heard anyone complain about the more recent DTV internet, > but I expect that it isn't as fast as a good DSL or Cable > connection. It all boils down to how much it's worth to you. > Internet is VERY important to me, and I'd pay whatever it cost to get > a good connection. If you want to spend your money on something less > important, like say.... food, go ahead :-) > > BTW, Bellsouth might be behaving now, since it doesn't seem like I'm > getting all the posts at one time like before, so I'll see if this > shows up in a timely fashion. > > Rusty (always on, as it should be)