Return-Path: <echristl@cisco.com>
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1)
  with ESMTP id 728215 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:09:20 -0500
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.102.122.149; envelope-from=echristl@cisco.com
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (64.102.124.13)
  by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2005 10:08:32 -0500
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Received: from [172.18.179.151] (echristl-linux.cisco.com [172.18.179.151])
	by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j1EF8UhF007099
	for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:08:30 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4210BEEE.4040309@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:08:30 -0500
From: Ernest Christley <echristl@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040929
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: new web forum  was    Re: Bandwidth/Netiquitte
 Issue.. "reply to all"
References: <list-726855@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-726855@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Russell Duffy wrote:

>   I just can't see any disadvantage to doing that, ...  I even 
> found "my" icon there :-)  
>

I just saw the first one.

-Web forums add a LOT of useless graphics and eye candy that slow the 
system down, and cause others in the office to ask what I'm up to.  I 
don't have that problem with an email program.

-I can read my email OFFLINE.

-I don't have to check for updates with email.  They come to me.

-I don't have to 'login' to a seperate website to read each email group.

-Web forums add a LOT of useless graphics and eye candy that slow the 
system down, and interrupt the conversation.