Return-Path: <sladerj@bellsouth.net>
Received: from imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.72] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1)
  with ESMTP id 727207 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 10:53:48 -0500
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.72; envelope-from=sladerj@bellsouth.net
Received: from JSLADE ([65.9.204.245]) by imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP
          id <20050213142846.RZNN2021.imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net@JSLADE>
          for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>;
          Sun, 13 Feb 2005 09:28:46 -0500
From: "John Slade" <sladerj@bellsouth.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: new web forum  WAS.
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 09:28:44 -0500
Message-ID: <NMELKLCBIAJLEHHCHLJBIEECECAA.sladerj@bellsouth.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-reply-to: <list-727096@logan.com>
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
Importance: Normal

>my vote is to stay with this format for the same reasons posted below.
OK, OK. I get the picture.

To be sure we don't have any kind of split (not that it seems likely) I'm
sealing the "fly-rotary" forum in a 20 year time capsule and burying it.

Anyone with "power in the rear" is welcome to join up at the forum and
discuss what it's like to be able to see where you're going.

John (Never say I didn't offer.)