Return-Path: Received: from [216.52.245.18] (HELO ispwestemail2.mdeinc.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1) with ESMTP id 727165 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 10:02:46 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.52.245.18; envelope-from=wschertz@ispwest.com Received: from 7n7z201 (unverified [67.136.146.33]) by ispwestemail2.mdeinc.com (Vircom SMTPRS 4.0.340.3) with SMTP id for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 07:01:57 -0800 Message-ID: <002d01c511dc$f91cf8f0$21928843@7n7z201> From: "William" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: new web forum was Re: Bandwidth/Netiquitte Issue.. "reply to all" Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 09:01:44 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 No, You are not alone, I am dial up and find forums frustrating. Bill Schertz KIS Cruiser # 4045 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charlie England" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005 10:36 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: new web forum was Re: Bandwidth/Netiquitte Issue.. "reply to all" > Russell Duffy wrote: > >> The last thing I want to do is cause trouble, get excommunicated for >> heresy, or split up this wonderful group, but I just can't see a valid >> reason to keep struggling with old technology. >> >> John, these are EXACTLY my sentiments. I'm sincerely grateful to Marvin >> for hosting this list for as long as he has. Never once has he requested >> anything for his trouble, nor do I believe he would accept any >> compensation if you offered it. I really feel like I've grown to know >> many of the people on this list, and regard them as friends. >> Unfortunately, I just can't overlook the advantages of using a web forum, >> and I believe it's time to move on to a new format. I just can't see any >> disadvantage to doing that, though I expect that some folks will resist >> change. I for one am ready to make a change, and have made the official >> first post in the new forum. I even found "my" icon there :-) >> Thanks for making this an option John. >> Rusty (change can be good, unless I only have John to talk to) > Uh.... there are some downsides, like 5-10 times the trouble for the 70% > of the world that are stuck with dialup (including me). I've tried several > forums like that & I find them so slow & frustrating to view that I never > go back. I can see about 30 headers at a time with regular email & email > list delivery. It's really frustrating to me if I have to go through > multiple clicks each time I want to see another block of maybe 5 headers, > wait for the page to load, then more clicks to see messages, wait for the > page to load, then the screen shows 60-80% framing detail instead of > 70-80% info with regular email. > > Am I the only one with these problems? > > With regular email & list servers, I only need to get online & click 'get > messages' to get all the info I'm interested in, instead of having to > navigate to 8 or 10 different web sites every day just to check on whether > there has been a new post. > > If everyone wants to move to the new format I'll follow, but it won't be > fun... > > Charlie > bottom feeding traditionalist > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html