Return-Path: Received: from imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.70] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1) with ESMTP id 727135 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 09:30:18 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.70; envelope-from=sqpilot@bellsouth.net Received: from [209.214.44.221] by imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050213142931.FFIV730.imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net@[209.214.44.221]> for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 09:29:31 -0500 Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.0.300 [265.8.7]); Sun, 13 Feb 2005 08:29:28 -0600 Message-ID: <023001c511d8$5aaafa90$dd2cd6d1@paul52u7f5qyav> From: "Paul" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Bandwidth/Netiquitte Issue.. "reply to all" Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 08:28:54 -0600 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=original I also like that the mail posts are sent directly to me, and I don't have to go searching for them. (OK....call me lazy). I can read the subject and simply hit the delete button if it is of no interest to me, or just read it, or read it and respond, or finally, save the message to my private file for safekeeping and later reference. Works very well for me. I have visited the Canard Aviation Forum, and I am glad it is there, because I do have a canard, and rotary engines are also discussed. One does, however have to do some searching to find what he/she is looking for. I'm happy that both exist. Paul Conner ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob White" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005 9:34 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Bandwidth/Netiquitte Issue.. "reply to all" > > Hi John, > > The Wiki isn't intended to compete with the mailing list or a forum. > It's oriented more toward collecting useful information in one place and > as such it competes more with a FAQ. The advantage of the Wiki over the > FAQ is that anyone with an interest can update and correct it. The > TikiWiki software I'm using includes a number of other features > including image galleries, blogs, and forums. I haven't implemented any > of them because they weren't related to the problem I was focusing on. > I'm not knocking your forum idea. If the group prefers that venue, I > will certainly participate. The one thing I like about the mail list > is that the posts are pushed to me. I don't have to go looking for > them. > > Bob White > > On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:30:22 -0500 > "John Slade" wrote: > > >> The WIKI idea, while commendable, >> is a >> poor representation of 1/10 of the features of a forum. > -- > http://www.bob-white.com > N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 (soon) > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.7 - Release Date: 2/10/2005 > > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.7 - Release Date: 2/10/2005