Return-Path: Received: from mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.115] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1) with ESMTP id 727085 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 07:45:18 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.131.115; envelope-from=keltro@att.net Received: from 204.127.135.40 ([204.127.135.40]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11) with SMTP id <20050213124433111009odnne>; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 12:44:33 +0000 Received: from [209.247.222.92] by 204.127.135.40; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 12:44:31 +0000 From: keltro@att.net (Kelly Troyer) To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: new web forum Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 12:44:31 +0000 Message-Id: <021320051244.10212.420F4BAF0008610B000027E42160280748019D9B040A05@att.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Oct 18 2004) X-Authenticated-Sender: a2VsdHJvQGF0dC5uZXQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_10212_1108298671_0" --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_10212_1108298671_0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit I am with you Charlie !! Another bottom feeder with dialup....... -- Kelly Troyer Dyke Delta/13B/RD1C/EC2 -------------- Original message from Charlie England : -------------- > Uh.... there are some downsides, like 5-10 times the trouble for the 70% > of the world that are stuck with dialup (including me). I've tried > several forums like that & I find them so slow & frustrating to view > that I never go back. I can see about 30 headers at a time with regular > email & email list delivery. It's really frustrating to me if I have to > go through multiple clicks each time I want to see another block of > maybe 5 headers, wait for the page to load, then more clicks to see > messages, wait for the page to load, then the screen shows 60-80% > framing detail instead of 70-80% info with regular email. > > Am I the only one with these problems? > > With regular email & list servers, I only need to get online & click > 'get messages' to get all the info I'm interested in, instead of having > to navigate to 8 or 10 different web sites every day just to check on > whether there has been a new post. > > If everyone wants to move to the new format I'll follow, but it won't be > fun... > > Charlie > bottom feeding traditionalist --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_10212_1108298671_0 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

I am with you Charlie !! Another bottom feeder with dialup.......

--
Kelly Troyer
Dyke Delta/13B/RD1C/EC2

-------------- Original message from Charlie England <ceengland@bellsouth.net>: --------------

> Uh.... there are some downsides, like 5-10 times the trouble for the 70%
> of the world that are stuck with dialup (including me). I've tried
> several forums like that & I find them so slow & frustrating to view
> that I never go back. I can see about 30 headers at a time with regular
> email & email list delivery. It's really frustrating to me if I have to
> go through multiple clicks each time I want to see another block of
> maybe 5 headers, wait for the page to load, then more clicks to see
> messages, wait for the page to load, then the screen shows 60-80%
> framing detail instead of 70-80% info with regular email.
>
> Am I the only one with these problems?
>
> With regular email & list servers, I only need to get online & click
> 'get messages' to get all the info I'm interested in, instead of having
> to navigate to 8 or 10 different web sites every day just to check on
> whether there has been a new post.
>
> If everyone wants to move to the new format I'll follow, but it won't be
> fun...
>
> Charlie
> bottom feeding traditionalist

--NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_10212_1108298671_0--