Return-Path: Received: from imo-d23.mx.aol.com ([205.188.139.137] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1) with ESMTP id 726978 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 03:17:06 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.139.137; envelope-from=WRJJRS@aol.com Received: from WRJJRS@aol.com by imo-d23.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id q.12d.56009fdb (657) for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 03:16:16 -0500 (EST) From: WRJJRS@aol.com Message-ID: <12d.56009fdb.2f4066d0@aol.com> Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 03:16:16 EST Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Vapor lock To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_12d.56009fdb.2f4066d0_boundary" X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6036 --part1_12d.56009fdb.2f4066d0_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dave, Do you feed the high pressure pump/s directly from the tank? Bill Jepson In a message dated 2/12/2005 2:15:08 PM Pacific Standard Time, daveleonard@cox.net writes: > I agree with Tracy 100%, as usual. There really is no benefit of a header > tank. > > Dave Leonard > > >> Of course, >> >> >> >> > --part1_12d.56009fdb.2f4066d0_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dave, Do you feed the high pressure= pump/s directly from the tank?
Bill Jepson

In a message dated 2/12/2005 2:15:08 PM Pacific Standard Time, daveleonard@c= ox.net writes:

I  agree with Tracy 1= 00%, as usual.  There really is no benefit of a header tank.
 
Dave Leonard

Of course, 






--part1_12d.56009fdb.2f4066d0_boundary--