Return-Path: Received: from mail02.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.183] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1) with ESMTP-TLS id 721057 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 19:22:25 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=211.29.132.183; envelope-from=lendich@optusnet.com.au Received: from george (d211-31-115-158.dsl.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.31.115.158]) by mail02.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j190KqY3016067 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:20:53 +1100 Message-ID: <012101c50e3d$83defc70$9e731fd3@george> From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Bad day at the airport - Ellison Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 10:23:01 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_011E_01C50E91.55387FA0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_011E_01C50E91.55387FA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MessageRusty, Those sizes are what Jerry is running for his PP and should be fine i.e. 2 of them. George ( down under) apparently a small number of CozyMKIV flyers are using the Ellison on = their 360's, (Nat, Steve Wright, David Dormier, Marc Zeitlin, and at = least one or two more). My understanding is that even the motor on = Paul's bench wouldn't produce more (or much more) power than the 360. = How can the 360's produce their power if that bore-size is an issue? = =20 Hi Tom, I can't say I understand it, but maybe Ken or someone will jump in and = bail me out. I gave up on the idea of using an Ellison when I realized = that the EFS-4-5 (180-225 HP) model only has a 1-7/8" bore. I've been = worried that I was on the verge of choking my 13B with "only" 1-5/8" = bores for each rotor. Now I suppose you could connect the runners for = both rotors together at a common plenum, and feed it with a single1-7/8" = bore since both rotors aren't requiring a huge airflow at the same time. = That seems like it should work, and I'd love to see someone try it. = Just hard to step back from true fuel injection. =20 Cheers, Rusty ------=_NextPart_000_011E_01C50E91.55387FA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Rusty,
Those sizes are what Jerry is running = for his PP=20 and should be fine i.e.
2 of them.
George ( down under)
apparently a small number of CozyMKIV flyers are = using the=20 Ellison on their 360's,  (Nat, Steve Wright, David Dormier, = Marc=20 Zeitlin, and at least one or two more).  My understanding is that = even the motor on Paul's bench wouldn't produce more (or = much more)=20 power than the 360.   How can the 360's produce = their=20 power if that bore-size is an=20 issue?        
 
Hi=20 Tom,
 
I can't say=20 I understand it, but maybe Ken or someone will jump in and bail me = out. =20 I gave up on the idea of using an Ellison when I realized that the = EFS-4-5=20 (180-225 HP) model only has a 1-7/8" bore.  I've been worried = that I was=20 on the verge of choking my 13B with "only" 1-5/8" bores for each=20 rotor.  Now I suppose you could connect the runners for=20 both rotors together at a common plenum, and feed it with a = single1-7/8"=20 bore since both rotors aren't requiring a huge airflow at the = same=20 time.  That seems like it should work, and I'd love to see = someone=20 try it.  Just hard to step back from true fuel=20 injection.  
 
Cheers,
Rusty=20    
------=_NextPart_000_011E_01C50E91.55387FA0--