Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.29; envelope-from=dale.r@cox.net
From: Dale Rogers <dale.r@cox.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Oil Filters
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:25:49 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20050203212550.MVC6409.fed1rmmtao10.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net>

Hi All,

   Wasn't there a rather longish thread on oil filters a 
couple of years ago?  Maybe it was somewhere else, but one 
conclusion was that Fram's standard oil filters were rather 
inferior: less filter surface, passing larger particles.

   When I get some time at home again, I'll look in my 
archives to see if i can find my copies.

Dale R.
COZY MkIV #1254


> From: "John Slade" <sladerj@bellsouth.net>
> Date: 2005/02/03 Thu AM 11:49:38 EST
> To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Oil Filters
> 
> MessageI guess the real question is what real benefit we get from this extra
> size?
> 
> I had the same question about the really really small K&N HP1008 recommended
> for the 3rd gen. It's even smaller than the HP1003. I pointed it out to
> Tracy when he was done here. He felt it was just fine for the job.
> John (throwing out radio shack switches wherever I find them)
>