Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao01.cox.net ([68.230.241.38] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8) with ESMTP id 657607 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 14:34:19 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.38; envelope-from=dale.r@cox.net Received: from smtp.west.cox.net ([172.18.180.51]) by fed1rmmtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-117-20041022) with SMTP id <20050203193347.GZZM4853.fed1rmmtao01.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net> for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:33:47 -0500 X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.15 (webedge20-101-1103-20040528) From: Dale Rogers To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Oil Filters Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:33:47 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20050203193347.GZZM4853.fed1rmmtao01.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net> Mark, Didn't you say your engine was built by Bruce (Turrentine)? Doesn't that mean that you no longer have the factorY oil filter adapter pad atop the rear housing? Dale R. COZY MkIV #1254 > From: "Mark R Steitle" > Date: 2005/02/03 Thu AM 10:01:31 EST > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Oil Filters > > > > > > Don't get me wrong, the K&N filter is a great unit, but I only bought > one because I had to have a high pressure remote filter. > > > > Rusty, > > I don't have that option as I can't fit the stock filter under the cowl, > unless I smash it down with a big hammer or put a bump in the cowl. :-0 > > > > Only real benefit I can think of is that the remote filter can be > mounted down low so that you don't dribble oil on your pretty engine > when changing the oil & filter. Also, more filter choices with the > remote mount. > > > > Mark S. > > >