Return-Path: Received: from imo-m15.mx.aol.com ([64.12.138.205] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8) with ESMTP id 655810 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 14:06:51 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.138.205; envelope-from=WRJJRS@aol.com Received: from WRJJRS@aol.com by imo-m15.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id q.ce.6169304d (15886) for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:06:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from aol.com (mow-d16.webmail.aol.com [205.188.139.132]) by air-id08.mx.aol.com (v104.17) with ESMTP id MAILINID81-3e0e420124a786; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 14:06:16 -0500 Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 14:06:15 -0500 From: WRJJRS@aol.com To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net ("Rotary motors in aircraft") Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: current tension bolt recommendations? MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <748D03FB.04401100.00051B7E@aol.com> X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0 X-AOL-IP: 66.127.99.234 X-AOL-Language: english Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lynn, Tracy, et all, The idea is to change the resonant frequency of the bolt and just the heat shrink would do that. Contact with the intermediate hsg. would do it better. Here is an idea, would it be possible to drill a small hole near the center of the bolt hole path from outside the housing and INJECT some RTV Silicone? A very small hole less than 1/8" would do it. The bolt would then be positively captured. Just thinking out loud. Bill Jepson