Return-Path: Received: from out010.verizon.net ([206.46.170.133] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8) with ESMTP id 620540 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 23:09:37 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.46.170.133; envelope-from=finn.lassen@verizon.net Received: from verizon.net ([4.12.145.173]) by out010.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20050125040908.JZTK24714.out010.verizon.net@verizon.net> for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:09:08 -0600 Message-ID: <41F5C661.8090205@verizon.net> Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 23:09:05 -0500 From: Finn Lassen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax; PROMO) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Flex plate <> Flywheel [FlyRotary] Re: flex plate References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out010.verizon.net from [4.12.145.173] at Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:09:07 -0600 Odd. My Ross used a custom 1/2" (I think) ALU plate with the starter ring gear crimped onto it. That plate bolts onto the automatic counterweight. The dampener assembly (with the spline for the input shaft) then bolts onto the ALU plate with 9 or 12 8mm allan head bolts, with 1/2" or maybe 3/4" ALU spacers between the dampener assembly and ALU plate. Finn Ernest Christley wrote: > Paul wrote: > >>> >>> What do the bolts screw into? Rivnuts? A backing plate? >>> >> >> The bolts screw directly into the existing holes on the automatic >> transmission flex plate. (which I used to think was a flywheel, until >> several helpful members of the Fly Rotary list helped to educate >> me). Paul Conner > > > > I've read this several times, and still not quite sure I can believe > it. The flex plate I have is thin. In the .040" range thin. I > realize that it will all be shear forces, but can 9 threaded holes be > expected to take the 800ft/lb of reaction forces that a typical NA > engine is expected to put out? > (I believe I got the 800ft/lb number out of the discussion of the > Schwertz beam motor mount on PL website). Just doesn't seem like it > could hold up. > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >> >