Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao10.cox.net ([68.230.241.29] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8) with ESMTP id 620345 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:42:35 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.29; envelope-from=dale.r@cox.net Received: from smtp.west.cox.net ([172.18.180.52]) by fed1rmmtao10.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-117-20041022) with SMTP id <20050125014204.QPAH7026.fed1rmmtao10.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net> for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:42:04 -0500 X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.15 (webedge20-101-1103-20040528) From: Dale Rogers To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Flex plate <> Flywheel Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:42:06 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20050125014204.QPAH7026.fed1rmmtao10.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net> Ummm, Guys? I can't address how Tracy's adapter is fastened to the flexplate, but from the appearance of mine, it follows the customs of other automatic transmissions: [1] The torque converter (the *real* flywheel in an automatic) is equipped with threaded studs matching the hole placement in the flexplate; it is then secured to the flexplate with locking nuts. or [2] The torque converter is equiped with threaded bosses matching the hole placement in the flexplate; cap screws go through the back of the flexplate and into the bosses. In neither case is any attempt made to thread into the thin metal of the flexplate - it is simply clamped between the fasteners and the torque converter. Hope this is some help, Dale R. COZY MkIV #1254 > From: "Ed Anderson" > Date: 2005/01/24 Mon PM 06:24:45 EST > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Flex plate <> Flywheel [FlyRotary] Re: flex > plate > > > I've read this several times, and still not quite sure I can believe > > it. The flex plate I have is thin. In the .040" range thin. I realize > > that it will all be shear forces, but can 9 threaded holes be expected > > to take the 800ft/lb of reaction forces that a typical NA engine is > > expected to put out? > > (I believe I got the 800ft/lb number out of the discussion of the > > Schwertz beam motor mount on PL website). Just doesn't seem like it > > could hold up. > > For crimmney sakes, Ernest - not so loud. If we never tell it, it won't > know it can't handle it. > > Ernest, I think the flex plate is more like .092 - 0.125 " thick or more. > In any case, I have never heard of a flex plate failing. > It will would also take a bit less stress without the gear shifting going on > as in the automobile. Also, not certain but I think the flywheel torque is > on the order of 150-200 ft/lb for an NA engine. > > Ed A