Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.71] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8) with ESMTP id 619509 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 12:18:24 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.71; envelope-from=13brv3@bellsouth.net Received: from rd ([65.6.194.9]) by imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050124171755.IMXY2276.imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net@rd> for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 12:17:55 -0500 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Bent tension bolts, ceramic coating Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:18:22 -0600 Message-ID: <01d701c50238$b4b2ad80$6101a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01D8_01C50206.6A183D80" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_01D8_01C50206.6A183D80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit And is a rebalance recommended? Ernest (having no idea what the coating would weigh) I think Ken Welter already said the coating is insignificant in weight, so it won't cause a problem. The layer they put on is so thin that it's hard to believe it even does anything. Rusty ------=_NextPart_000_01D8_01C50206.6A183D80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

And is a rebalance recommended?

Ernest (having = no idea=20 what the coating would weigh)

I think = Ken Welter=20 already said the coating is insignificant in weight, so it won't cause a = problem.  The layer they put on is so thin that it's hard to = believe it=20 even does anything. 
 
Rusty
 



 ------=_NextPart_000_01D8_01C50206.6A183D80--