Return-Path: Received: from [129.116.87.171] (HELO MAIL01.austin.utexas.edu) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8) with ESMTP id 613387 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:52:15 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=129.116.87.171; envelope-from=mark.steitle@austin.utexas.edu X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: turbine Exhaust??????? - No! not turbo related Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:51:43 -0600 Message-ID: <87DBA06C9A5CB84B80439BA09D86E69E6CBF12@MAIL01.austin.utexas.edu> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [FlyRotary] Re: turbine Exhaust??????? - No! not turbo related Thread-Index: AcT+UDyFLxwRp74yR9GvVpZOXHY7WgABxBkA From: "Mark R Steitle" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Ed, OK, now I see. One more question. How are the disc assemblies held in place? =20 Mark S. -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Ed Anderson Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 11:58 AM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: turbine Exhaust??????? - No! not turbo related Hi Mark, Yes, sorry about that. I've taken some photos of the modified discs - but basically they are made of 3" dia 1/8" SS 304 Discs. I cut from the perimeter in stopping 1/2" from the center. This slices the disc into 8 equal area tabs. The tabs are shaped like a truncated triangle. I then twist each tab to about a 45 deg angle from the plane of the disc - forming what looks like a 8 bladed fan. The FAW theory indicates that the shockwave pulse should see a (almost) solid disc looking at it perpendicular to the plane of the discs (provided you don't bend the tabs more than 45 degs) this should reflect a considerable amount of the energy of the wave back on the next incoming wave (and/or disc). However, the exhaust gas molecules should be able to still find a path around the tabs. If you look at the disc from the front (or back) you see mostly metal - if you turn it 45 deg and view you see lots of open area created by the twisted tabs for the gas to flow through. At least that is the Ed Anderson theory of how these discs should work. I first considered discs with holes - but that would not preclude propagation of the energy of the pulse and would probably restrict gas flow considerably. It appears to work in that it does knock the noise level down considerably and (when not spinning) does not appear to be overly restrictive to the exhaust gas flow. The two discs per tube does not seem to adversely affect power and does knock the sound from 125 dB to 104dB based on measurements using the Radio Shack sound meter on setting C fast response. Earnest's suggestion that I reinstall all 4 (non-rotating) discs back in probably is a good idea to see what kind of effect the additional discs would have. I know flying back from Tracy's, I hit 6800 rpm in flight which is 200 higher than achieved with straight pipes and also hit 6000 rpm static on take off - but, it was in cold dense air so much of that increase might be due to the denser air. Photos MVC-009F shows one of the discs shattered by the shock waves pounding. Next time I create a disc I will drill stress relief holes at the termination of the saw cut to relieve stress somewhat. MVC-011F shows the discs from two views. While there is some opening the shockwave would see, its fairly small compared to the opening the gas sees and I believe several discs reduces the potential area for transmittal of the shock wave. Also, the angle of the tab could be less than 45 deg which would reduce the open area the FAW sees even more - but, might impede gas flow more as well. MVC-010F shows the violence that occurred in the exhaust system. The disc has been shattered and the remnants stuffed into the perforated tube (I initially used to maintain disc spacing). Note the deformation of the ends of the perforated tube - evidence of tremendous heat and force. Clearly any attempt to reduce the sound is a compromise with gas flow and this is just an experiment - but, which seems to have some merit. But the violence of the rotary exhaust stream continues to impress me, so Treat the rotary exhaust with caution! Ed