Return-Path: Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8) with ESMTP id 613371 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:43:46 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.102.122.149; envelope-from=echristl@cisco.com Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (64.102.124.12) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Jan 2005 13:43:16 -0500 X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Received: from echristl-linux.cisco.com (echristl-linux.cisco.com [172.18.179.151]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j0JIhEW0025522 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:43:14 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Battery load test From: Ernest Christley To: Rotary motors in aircraft In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1106160193.12865.149.camel@echristl-linux.cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-1) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:43:14 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 12:11, Russell Duffy wrote: > Greetings, > > With all this talk of battery load testers, I have to admit that I'm not > sure what good they will do us. Is this just a standard test where you put > a heavy load on the battery for a few seconds to see what the voltage drops > to? > > I think I'd be far more interested in figuring out how much current my > system draws in "alt failed" mode, and coming up with a tester that can be > set for that load, and told to time it from start to when the voltage > reaches some set point like 9V (if that's what Tracy's EC-2 pukes at). > Anyone know of a tester that will do that? Rusty, I may be completely wrong, but the load testers do basically the same thing more conveniently. You might wait for hours for the EC-2 and a couple fuel pumps to pull the battery down far enough to be meaningful. The load testers will flow big current and is already attached to a voltmeter. Hook it up and know how healthy the battery is in only a few minutes.