Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao11.cox.net ([68.230.241.28] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8) with ESMTP id 610034 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:26:18 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.28; envelope-from=dale.r@cox.net Received: from smtp.west.cox.net ([172.18.180.52]) by fed1rmmtao11.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-117-20041022) with SMTP id <20050117152547.GQYL28808.fed1rmmtao11.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net> for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:25:47 -0500 X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.15 (webedge20-101-1103-20040528) From: Dale Rogers To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Need Advise Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:25:47 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20050117152547.GQYL28808.fed1rmmtao11.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net> Steve, It certainly sounds as though, at flying speed, airflow could be creating a low pressure zone where your vent tube opens to the atmosphere. How about terminating it in a known high pressure zone, such as the NACA plenum? Dale R. COZY MkIV #1254 > From: Steve Brooks > Date: 2005/01/16 Sun PM 10:08:40 EST > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Need Advise > > Rusty,I'll have to take a look at this more when I get > back home. I'm staying with freinds and using their > computer, which is definitely bandwidth challenged. > > I don't like the sounds of the side seal issue, but I > hope it is something simple. I've got about 12 hours > on the engine since overhaul, and don't know why I > would have a side seal issue now, but who knows. > > One thing that I forgot to mention.... it only does it > while flying. I ran it on the ground with the cowling > off for a total of 15 minutes or so. Not a drop. > That included some full power runs up to about 40 kts > or so. > > Maybe the hose location is the issue and has to have > flying speeds ? Don't know. Wishful thinking maybe >