Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #14974
From: Paul <sqpilot@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: which engine
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 21:41:26 -0600
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Thanks, Bulent, Bob and Dale....Kinda what I suspected, but wasn't certain. Paul Conner

----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob White" <bob@bob-white.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 7:34 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: which engine


Hi Paul,

I may have this mixed up, but I think what Bruce built for me was a 4
port (Turbo?) engine with NA rotor housings.  The rotor housings have
the exhaust diverters in them.  The advantage of the 4 port is simpler
intake.  He reccomended the second gen engine because more of them had
been sold and were more readily available.  It is street ported with
9.7:1 rotors.

Bob White

On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:05:08 -0600
"Paul" <sqpilot@bellsouth.net> wrote:

I need to query the group....which might be the best choice of engines
(going non-turbo)....a street ported 4-port with high compression
rotors, or a street ported NA 6 port with high compression rotors?  I
could do it either way....just don't know if one has advantages over
the other.  Thanks in advance for all input and suggestions.  Paul
Conner


-- http://www.bob-white.com
N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 (soon) Intake Manifold ships next week?

 Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
 Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html


-- No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.9 - Release Date: 1/6/2005






--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.9 - Release Date: 1/6/2005

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster