Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #14969
From: Bob White <bob@bob-white.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] which engine
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:34:14 -0700
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Hi Paul,

I may have this mixed up, but I think what Bruce built for me was a 4
port (Turbo?) engine with NA rotor housings.  The rotor housings have
the exhaust diverters in them.  The advantage of the 4 port is simpler
intake.  He reccomended the second gen engine because more of them had
been sold and were more readily available.  It is street ported with
9.7:1 rotors.

Bob White

On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:05:08 -0600
"Paul" <sqpilot@bellsouth.net> wrote:

I need to query the group....which might be the best choice of engines
(going non-turbo)....a street ported 4-port with high compression
rotors, or a street ported NA 6 port with high compression rotors?  I
could do it either way....just don't know if one has advantages over
the other.  Thanks in advance for all input and suggestions.  Paul
Conner


--
http://www.bob-white.com
N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 (soon) Intake Manifold ships next week?
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster