Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao09.cox.net ([68.230.241.30] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 594202 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 01:20:29 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.30; envelope-from=ALVentures@cox.net Received: from BigAl ([68.7.14.39]) by fed1rmmtao09.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-117-20041022) with ESMTP id <20050107061957.XVGY2638.fed1rmmtao09.cox.net@BigAl> for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 01:19:57 -0500 From: "Al Gietzen" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: fluidyne oil cooler Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:20:00 -0800 Message-ID: <000001c4f480$eb00b5a0$6400a8c0@BigAl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C4F43D.DCDFE6A0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C4F43D.DCDFE6A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =20 =20 -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Russell Duffy Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 2:21 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: fluidyne oil cooler =20 You should be able to get flow rate; pressure drop; heat rejection = rating from Fluidyne. Based on my calcs, it would be good to about a steady = 120 hp in a rotary, if you get good air flow through it.=20 =20 How can you calculate this without the info you mentioned? How much = air flow is "good". What is the temp? I appreciate the thought, but I = don't really believe all the calculations in the world will give a real answer when you consider all the variables. It might be interesting, and will certainly be in the ballpark, but you won't really know how it works = until you try it. =20 I knew when I wrote it you didn't want to hear what I had to say:-). = And I didn't say I was right, just based on my calcs and comparisons, that was = my judgement. I did the analysis for my installation, and just scaled your fluidyne cooler off of that. Of course the answer you get depends on = your objectives and assumptions. I'd like to be able to run a continuous = 75-80% power on a 90F day at climb speed.=20 =20 Yeah; a complete analysis is complex, and beyond the tools that I have = at my disposal. But back when I was heading up an engineering analysis group, = it was amazing what we did. A few tens of thousands of dollars solved = problems that hundreds of thousands of build 'em and bust 'em dollars would never solve. I'm just fortunate to still have some of the simpler analytic = tools at my disposal, so questions like "how much flow is good?" aren't too = tough and gets you in the ballpark pretty quick. Take the amount of heat you = have to dump, the specific heat of the fluid, and an approximate temperature change, and you can calculate the flow rate right now. Actually getting that flow rate through the heat exchanger may be the tough part. =20 Fluidyne has tested their oil cooler cores and have heat rejection heat rejection rates, pressure drops, as a function of flow rates, etc; it's = just tough to get them to give you the data. I discussed it with one of = their engineers years ago when I was doing my design. =20 And you're right; ultimately you have to install it and test it. The = simple analysis just increases the odds of getting close on the first try. =20 Al =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C4F43D.DCDFE6A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

 

 

-----Original = Message-----
From: Rotary motors in = aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Russell Duffy
Sent:
Thursday, January 06, 2005 2:21 = PM
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = fluidyne oil cooler

 

You should be able to get flow rate; pressure drop; heat rejection rating = from Fluidyne.  Based on my calcs, it would be good to about a steady = 120 hp in a rotary, if you get good air flow through it. 

 

How can you = calculate this without the info you mentioned?   How much air flow is "good".  What is the temp?  I appreciate the = thought, but I don't really believe all the calculations in the world will give a real = answer when you consider all the variables.  It might be interesting, and = will certainly be in the ballpark, but you won't really know how it works = until you try it.

  

I knew when I wrote it you = didn’t want to hear what I had to sayJ.  And I didn’t say I was right, just based on my = calcs and comparisons, that was my judgement.  I did the analysis for my installation, and just scaled your fluidyne cooler off of that.  Of = course the answer you get depends on your objectives and assumptions.  = I’d like to be able to run a continuous 75-80% power on a 90F day at climb = speed.

 

Yeah; a complete analysis is = complex, and beyond the tools that I have at my disposal.  But back when I = was heading up an engineering analysis group, it was amazing what we = did.  A few tens of thousands of dollars solved problems that hundreds of thousands = of build ‘em and bust ‘em dollars would never solve.  I’m = just fortunate to still have some of the simpler analytic tools at my = disposal, so questions like “how much flow is good?” aren’t too tough and = gets you in the ballpark pretty quick.  Take the amount of heat you have to = dump, the specific heat of the fluid, and an approximate temperature change, = and you can calculate the flow rate right now.  Actually getting that flow = rate through the heat exchanger may be the tough part.

 

Fluidyne has tested their oil = cooler cores and have heat rejection heat rejection rates, pressure drops, as a function of flow rates, etc; it’s just tough to get them to give = you the data.  I discussed it with one of their engineers years ago when I = was doing my design.

 

And you’re right; = ultimately you have to install it and test it.  The simple analysis just increases = the odds of getting close on the first try.

 

Al

 

------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C4F43D.DCDFE6A0--