Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #14844
From: Russell Duffy <13brv3@bellsouth.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: RV-3 engine rebuild
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:23:54 -0600
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message

If you make your own, you will
be controlling the overlap and the closing point. So the Pport will be as
tractable as you make it.

Thanks for the info Lynn.  I knew I could count on you to get me thinking about this again.  For the record, I don't think I'd consider this for the RV-3 engine, because I don't want to make a long drawn out project out of getting it back in the air, however I am considering it for the single rotor. 

I guess my biggest question is what the benefit would be for us.  If we shoot for making top power in the "low" 7000-7500 rpm range, will we gain anything from the PP configuration?  In other words, if you compare a street port, to a tamed PP at 7500 rpm, will there be significantly more power with the PP? 

Thanks,
Rusty (have housings, and boring bar)

  

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster