Return-Path: Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net ([204.127.202.55] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 576836 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 12:21:02 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.202.55; envelope-from=jesse@jessfarr.com Received: from office5 (pcp04959909pcs.midval01.tn.comcast.net[68.59.199.44]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with SMTP id <2004122217203301100atlshe>; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:20:33 +0000 Message-ID: <01b001c4e84a$78cab130$057ba8c0@farr.com> From: "jesse farr" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Oil coolers Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 12:20:02 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01AD_01C4E820.8FC3D530" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_01AD_01C4E820.8FC3D530 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MessageAgree; fluidyne looks tougher to me. Whoever tries either will = hopefully let us know. jofarr ----- Original Message ----- From: Mark R Steitle=20 Comparing the pictures to my Fluidyne cooler, the perma-cool design = looks like the same size would be lighter, but less durable. The fin = spacing looks to be less dense on the perma-cool. But then its hard to = tell much from a picture. Mounting would be an important issue, but = possibly easier for a lighter unit. -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] = On Behalf Of Bobby J. Hughes I found this company while researching oil coolers. Does anyone have = any experience or information about these products. They advertise they = pressure test the coolers to 300 psi. Fluidyne advertises testing at 200 = psi. They look rugged. http://www.perma-cool.com/Catalog/Cat_page10.html ------=_NextPart_000_01AD_01C4E820.8FC3D530 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message=
Agree; fluidyne looks tougher to = me.  Whoever=20 tries either will hopefully let us know. jofarr
----- Original Message ----- = From: Mark R Steitle =
Comparing = the=20 pictures to my Fluidyne cooler, the perma-cool design looks like the = same size=20 would be lighter, but less durable.  The fin spacing looks to be = less=20 dense on the perma-cool.  But then its hard to tell much from a=20 picture.  Mounting would be an important issue, but possibly = easier for a=20 lighter unit.

From:=20 Rotary motors in aircraft = [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On=20 Behalf Of Bobby J. Hughes

I found = this=20 company while researching oil coolers. Does anyone have any experience = or=20 information about these products. They advertise they pressure test = the=20 coolers to 300 psi. Fluidyne advertises testing at 200 psi. They look=20 rugged.

http://www.per= ma-cool.com/Catalog/Cat_page10.html

------=_NextPart_000_01AD_01C4E820.8FC3D530--