Return-Path: Received: from out009.verizon.net ([206.46.170.131] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 575044 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 23:19:31 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.46.170.131; envelope-from=finn.lassen@verizon.net Received: from verizon.net ([4.12.145.173]) by out009.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20041221041856.DWAP24088.out009.verizon.net@verizon.net> for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 22:18:56 -0600 Message-ID: <41C7A42C.1070604@verizon.net> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 23:18:52 -0500 From: Finn Lassen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax; PROMO) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Oil cooler mount updated pictures References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030909080300050408070004" X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out009.verizon.net from [4.12.145.173] at Mon, 20 Dec 2004 22:18:56 -0600 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030909080300050408070004 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit You're right, of course. I've got faily stiff engine mounts and am counting on that rubber insolator in the back to handle the loads. Finn Bulent Aliev wrote: >On 12/20/04 9:44 AM, "Finn Lassen" wrote: > > > >>Here's my current mounting. Had to change it a bit when switching to the >>RWS PSRU. >> >>Finn >> >> > >Finn, If I'm reading the photos correctly, one side of the cooler is mounted >to the engine mount and the other to the engine. The mount is more or less >static, and the engine vibrates? Looks like this is something to avoid. >My oil cooler and radiator are all mounted to the engine mount. I don't >think cross-mounting is a good idea? >Buly > > > > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >>> >>> > > > --------------030909080300050408070004 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit You're right, of course. I've got faily stiff engine mounts and am counting on that rubber insolator in the back to handle the loads.

Finn

Bulent Aliev wrote:
On 12/20/04 9:44 AM, "Finn Lassen" <finn.lassen@verizon.net> wrote:

  
Here's my current mounting. Had to change it a bit when switching to the
RWS PSRU.

Finn
    

Finn, If I'm reading the photos correctly, one side of the cooler is mounted
to the engine mount and the other to the engine. The mount is more or less
static, and the engine vibrates? Looks like this is something to avoid.
My oil cooler and radiator are all mounted to the engine mount. I don't
think cross-mounting is a good idea?
Buly


  
 Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
 Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
--------------030909080300050408070004--