Return-Path: Received: from mail.theofficenet.com ([65.166.240.5] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with SMTP id 574631 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 17:33:08 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.166.240.5; envelope-from=jackoford@theofficenet.com Received: (qmail 22165 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2004 22:21:37 -0000 Received: from dpc691941229.direcpc.com (HELO jack) (69.19.41.229) by mail.theofficenet.com with SMTP; 20 Dec 2004 22:21:37 -0000 Message-ID: <014001c4e6e3$c6b3e6e0$0200a8c0@jack> From: "Jack Ford" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Fw: F/A-37 -Hollywood! Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 14:32:14 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 I smelled the rat at Lockheed Burbank. Lockheed ain't there anymore (I fly in and out of there monthly). Great story anyway. Jack Ford ----- Original Message ----- From: To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 1:58 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Fw: F/A-37 -Hollywood! > In a message dated 12/20/2004 1:01:19 PM Central Standard Time, > micallahan@worldnet.att.net writes: > > << Yeah, I was very suspect of the droop nose and the big windshield > myself. Not only that, why in the world would this "pilot" have her name on > the side of a prototype and why doesn't it have the usual twelve foot tall > letters of the model number (YF/A-37)? Forward swept elevons? I don't think > so. The clincher was the bottom pic with the guys in the foreground manning > a big movie camera. Mike C. > > > >> > > Not so fast there boys. That is an Air Force camera team. It won't be an "F" > anything until after acceptance testing is completed. It will be a YF > something until then. > > > > The canopy is the new Buckey strand reinforced Pyrex glass structure. The > nose raises up to streamline at cruise (mach 3.8 without AB) it droops for > landing like the Concord. The forward swept horizontals and the lack of verticals is > part of the shock wave management system. The rudder works split strakes at > the wing tips to replicate rudder feel. There are rudder pedals so you can > overpower the computers for air shows and such. Normally the feet are in stirrups > in the front of the seat pack. > The whole nose is the escape pod. Developed and tested to 40,000 feet by > Rutan's Scaled Composites people. The escape pod is flyable and has a range of 50 > statute miles. Powered by powdered nitril rubber and nitrous. It has auto > pilot and will auto track to the nearest friendly area before deploying the chute. > > A picture of this thing got out, so they made up the movie story to cover it. > Now DOD has to front the movie to throw off the bad guys. It's been flying > between Tonopa and Groom Lake every night for a year. > > There is a guy on that mountain every night with a 16" reflector telescope > who says a C-5 leaves there at dusk and this thing lands blacked out around > midnight. His guess is that they either take it close by to launch it, or they can > launch it right out the back door of the C-5. Pretty cool stuff. > > The one on the carrier was the third airframe. The first was the structures > test frame so it got bent and vibrated through two lifetimes. It will be > repaired and shipped to the AF Museum In Dayton next year. Although it can launch > from a carrier it is not what the Navy wanted. So the Naval version will have > more wing area and a slightly lower cruise speed, and carry more ordnance. Air > frame three is all Air Force > > The first flight test airframe is back at Lockheed Burbank for repairs after > a fueling fire in October. This will be the follow on to the F-36, the one > that can hover. The F-36 replaces the F-22 that just formed its first squadron. > Some folks say this one can not only hover, but can leave unimproved locations > with full fuel and ordnance load, > by using dropable assist rocket motors in tubes along side the lift fans. > Same fans as the F-36. > > During this carrier event they were just firing those rockets one at a time > and filming the effect on the airframe from the epoxy based nonskid surface > that is used on all carriers. Also they placed various support equipment nearby > to see what effect that would suffer. > > How do I know this? > > > > > > > I don't. I just made it up. > > > > > > If you felt real proud there for a minute, > > Keep right on feeling proud. > > This kind of stuff is in the works right now. The looser in the flyoff that > the F-22 won is now at the Air Force Museum and it has the rudders laid down > almost flat just like the movie plane. The YF-23 I believe. It is just > beautiful. Long and snake like. And it flew real well. Just a bit too pricey. > > The F-36 really does hover, and is the replacement for the F-22. > > There is an F-22 at the Museum also. The one that crashed I suspect. Worth > the trip to Dayton. One of the top three airplane museums on earth. > > > This and much more, is coming soon to an air show near you. God bless America. > > > Lynn E. Hanover > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >