Return-Path: Received: from out010.verizon.net ([206.46.170.133] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 573164 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 12:38:57 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.46.170.133; envelope-from=rotary.coot@verizon.net Received: from [67.225.117.20] ([65.239.57.253]) by out010.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20041219173821.OJHT24714.out010.verizon.net@[67.225.117.20]> for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:38:21 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: res0c5l1@incoming.verizon.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 09:33:32 -0800 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" From: Ken Welter Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Engine damage thoughts Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="============_-1108644273==_ma============" X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out010.verizon.net from [65.239.57.253] at Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:38:19 -0600 --============_-1108644273==_ma============ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" I have rebuilt thousands of VW engines and I find the rotary much simpler and I find a piece of mind in flying behind an engine I have rebuilt myself. Ken >The trepidation and sense of doom when thinking about overhauling a rotary, >is like that in you first solo flight, when the instructor stepped >out and said >take it around once. The distance between that moment, and the feelings right >after that first successful flight, are not unlike the disparity between >disassembly and running in your first rebuilt engine. > >There was never anything to dread. It is the same experience for everyone. > >The parts count of a rotary is so low, that there is a real disapointment at >the end of the disassembly process. The oil pump/chain/sprockets/spacers is a >more complex >assembly than the rest of the engine. > >With the correct tools you can strip one to zero assemblies in less than one >hour. > >Once you have done it a few times, you can reassemble it in less than three >hours. >I am not the fastest builder on earth and I can do it in the dirt at a race >track on a pickle bucket. (the number one most popular rotary engine stand). > >If you have ever done a piston engine, this is less than half as difficult in >complexity, time, and parts count. It is a joy to work on. It is easy to >understand. The first time you get one apart, you will be grinning >from ear to ear >and wondering why you didn't do this years ago. > >Watch Bruces video. Buy the big socket and the 1/2" adaptor at Sears. Buy an >engine from the core pile at the junk yard. Jump in. A great way to blow a >Saturday, and you will love it. This is better than any piston engine for >powering airplanes. > >I am in the middle of changing houses right now, and then building a new >house on Florida (cannot stand the cold anymore) but after that if you want to >stop in and build and engine from start to finish, there are always >enough parts >here to do just that. >Or get you picture sitting in the race car. What ever. Come on down. If you >gort the impression that I am enthusiastic about the rotary, you are correct. > > >Lynn E. Hanover > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html --============_-1108644273==_ma============ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" [FlyRotary] Re: Engine damage thoughts
   I have rebuilt thousands of VW engines and I find the rotary much simpler and I find a piece of mind in flying behind an engine I have rebuilt myself.
    Ken



The trepidation and sense of doom when thinking about overhauling a rotary,
is like that in you first solo flight, when the instructor stepped out and said
take it around once. The distance between that moment, and the feelings right
after that first successful flight, are not unlike the disparity between
disassembly and running in your first rebuilt engine.

There was never anything to dread. It is the same experience for everyone.

The parts count of a rotary is so low, that there is a real disapointment at
the end of the disassembly process. The oil pump/chain/sprockets/spacers is a
more complex
assembly than the rest of the engine.

With the correct tools you can strip one to zero assemblies in less than one
hour.

Once you have done it a few times, you can reassemble it in less than three
hours.
I am not the fastest builder on earth and I can do it in the dirt at a race
track on a pickle bucket. (the number one most popular rotary engine stand).

If you have ever done a piston engine, this is less than half as difficult in
complexity, time, and parts count. It is a joy to work on. It is easy to
understand. The first time you get one apart, you will be grinning from ear to ear
and wondering why you didn't do this years ago.

Watch Bruces video. Buy the big socket and the 1/2" adaptor at Sears. Buy an
engine from the core pile at the junk yard. Jump in. A great way to blow a
Saturday, and you will love it. This is better than any piston engine for
powering airplanes.

I am in the middle of changing houses right now, and then building a new
house on Florida (cannot stand the cold anymore) but after that if you want to
stop in and build and engine from start to finish, there are always enough parts
here to do just that.
Or get you picture sitting in the race car. What ever. Come on down. If you
gort the impression that I am enthusiastic about the rotary, you are correct.


Lynn E. Hanover

>>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
>>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html

--============_-1108644273==_ma============--