Return-Path: <Joseph.M.Berki@grc.nasa.gov>
Received: from mx2.grc.nasa.gov ([128.156.11.69] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5)
  with ESMTP id 569716 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:57:14 -0500
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=128.156.11.69; envelope-from=Joseph.M.Berki@grc.nasa.gov
Received: from lombok-fi.grc.nasa.gov (seraph1.grc.nasa.gov [128.156.10.10])
	by mx2.grc.nasa.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2BFC2E3
	for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:56:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from apataki.grc.nasa.gov (apataki.grc.nasa.gov [139.88.112.35])
	by lombok-fi.grc.nasa.gov (NASA GRC TCPD 8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iBGDughJ025523
	for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:56:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by apataki.grc.nasa.gov (NASA GRC TCPD 8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iBGDugf7017226
	for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:56:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from apataki.grc.nasa.gov ([127.0.0.1])by localhost (apataki.grc.n
	asa.gov [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)with ESMTP id 15228-08 for <f
	lyrotary@lancaironline.net>;Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:56:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from manihi.grc.nasa.gov (manihi.grc.nasa.gov [139.88.112.36])by a
	pataki.grc.nasa.gov (NASA GRC TCPD 8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iBGDuXtE017
	185for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:56:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from GR7700013583.lerc.nasa.gov (gr7700013583.grc.nasa.gov [139.88
	.139.62])by manihi.grc.nasa.gov (NASA GRC TCPD 8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP 
	id iBGDuXtx017146for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:56:
	33 -0500 (EST)
X-Info: ODIN / NASA Glenn Research Center
Message-Id: <5.1.1.5.2.20041216084743.010f73b0@popserve.lerc.nasa.gov>
X-Sender: scberki@popserve.lerc.nasa.gov
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:56:32 -0500
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
From: Joseph M Berki <Joseph.M.Berki@grc.nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Cooling
In-Reply-To: <list-569707@logan.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii;
	format=flowed
X-imss-version: 2.0
X-imss-result: Passed
X-imss-approveListMatch: *@*.nasa.gov

Hi John,
         I considered the 3r gen coolers but I wondered why the car had 
concerns using these coolers.  See 
http://www.negative-camber.org/crispyrx7/cwrcoolers.htm The only way to fit 
two of these coolers would be to mount them in different locations, or 
build a plenum setup like you did but I do not have the room.  One of my 
options is to use the 2nd gen cooler and hope the resulting space for the 
rad will cool it.  Pacific Oil coolers recommended the AeroClassic unit 18 
rows p/n 8000353.  Also if I use evap cores for water the 3rd gen coolers 
might work.

Joe

  08:36 AM 12/16/2004 -0500, you (John Slade) wrote:
> > Each airframe has it's own design form, fit, function limitations for the
> > cooling system.  In the case of the Limo EZ, it is difficult to
> > fit a Mazda oil cooler and a radiator with adequate volume.
>Joe - what about the 3rd gen stock cooler? It's about 10" * 6" * 2". Much
>easier to fit in a tight space. I have two of these installed.
>John
>
>
> >>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> >>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html