Return-Path: Received: from server290.com ([64.14.68.141] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with SMTP id 568415 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:15:22 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.14.68.141; envelope-from=kathy@atkinsrotary.com Received: (qmail 31687 invoked by uid 2007); 15 Dec 2004 15:15:14 -0000 Message-ID: <20041215151514.12793.qmail@server290.com> Reply-To: "kathy" From: "kathy" To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Single Rotor Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 15:15:14 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: WebMail 2.0 X-Originating-IP: 70.56.66.227 X-Originating-Email: kathy@atkinsrotary.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Rb is a good referance. We weigh each rotor as it can be off by a couple of oz. When building the engine a couple of oz can make a big differance. FYI we have 2 single rotor shafts available depending on the stress loads. I could get more detailed information if you like. Kathy -------Original Message------- > From: "Fred Osborn" > Subject: [FlyRotary] Single Rotor > Sent: 15 Dec 2004 14:38:48 > > In a message dated 12/15/2004 Fred Osborn wrote: > > > rotors in > > > In a subsequent message dated 12/15/2004 07:40 EST Lehanover@aol.com[1] > > wrote: > > > < I thought that weight would have to be added in order to balance a 9 > > pound > > < rotor. Is that not the case. > > According to the RB rotor weight charts my 87 NA rotors weigh 10.04#. I > had to > add approx. 4oz. to each balance weight to get to a crude assembly > balance on > a pair of parallel level round bars. The 89 NA rotor weighs 9.54#. Thus > the hope > that 8oz. lower rotor weight will bring me close to a static balance > condition. > Then I will have to go through a rather complex measure procedure to get > close > to a dynamic balance. As far as I have been able to determine no one is > setup to > do a spinning dynamic balance on a single rotor. > > > cooling oil > > crank. Does > > < Using the front stationary gear sounds to me to be the way to go. > > With the > > < large direct oil drainback at the bottom of the stationary gear. > > Yes, you need the front stationary gear to position all of the front needle > bearing stuff anyway and it's much lighter than the rear gear. > > Lynn, it sounds like you are seriously considering a single rotor > engine. Did I miss > something in a previous post? What would you plan to do for an e-shaft? > I cut up > a 13B part, did some crude machining, and shrink fit the cut down front > part into > a pocket in the rear rotor journal. Definitely not a flight article but > it turns smooth > in a single rotor buildup so I can try doing some other things I'm > interested in trying. > > Please all, forgive my crude editing, I'm just beginning to attempt to > learn to post > to this forum. > > Fred Osborn > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/[2] > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html[3] -------Original Message-------