Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.101] (HELO ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 568238 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:01:00 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.101; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-069-132-109-019.carolina.rr.com [69.132.109.19]) by ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id iBFD0S4S007575 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:00:29 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <002401c4e2a6$15607cf0$2502a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Injectors Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:00:42 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Steve, I have attempted to use 550 CC injectors on two occasions and while I flew with them for a while, I finally removed them for the reason you cited - too rich at low rpms. FWIW Ed Anderson ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Brooks" > Right now I'm running the stock 550cc injectors, but I'm considering > changing the primary injectors to 440cc, to help the low end mixture, and > leave the secondaries at 550cc, so that I still get sufficient fuel flow > with the turbo at higher power settings. > > My thinking is that the 440cc injectors would allow me turn the fuel > pressure back up to 38 lbs. and hopefully still be able to tune the lower > end where only the primary injectors are supplying fuel. > > Does anyone have experience doing this, hopefully with a turbo, or just have > an opinion ? > > Steve Brooks > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >