Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.7; envelope-from=Lehanover@aol.com
From: Lehanover@aol.com
Message-ID: <1b9.8dd36be.2ef18ac4@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 07:40:36 EST
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Single Rotor
To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 12/15/2004 5:22:19 AM Central Standard Time, 
fosborn@infowest.com writes:

<< I plan on using a 89-92 na rotor 
 which is 8 oz.
 lighter that my '87 rotors in the hope that I can get to a balanced 
 assembly by
 removing a small amount ot weight from my '87 balance weights. >>


I thought that weight would have to be added in order to balance a 9 pound 
rotor.
Is that not the case. 

I was thinking of adding a groove in the main bearing to supply cooling oil 
to the rotor interior, rather than trying to drill a hole in the crank. Does 
that sound plausable?

Using the front stationary gear sounds to me to be the way to go. With the 
large direct oil drainback at the bottom of the stationary gear.


Lynn E. Hanover

Lynn E. Hanover