Return-Path: Received: from imo-m16.mx.aol.com ([64.12.138.206] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 568209 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 07:24:20 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.138.206; envelope-from=Lehanover@aol.com Received: from Lehanover@aol.com by imo-m16.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id q.d9.1bd50d94 (4262) for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 07:23:46 -0500 (EST) From: Lehanover@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 07:23:46 EST Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Oil Cooling/Pumping To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 138 In a message dated 12/15/2004 12:45:40 AM Central Standard Time, jewen@comporium.net writes: << With all the problems encountered with leaking oil coolers, I was wondering if the following has any merit. Instead of using the engine driven oil pump to circulate oil through the cooler, why not install a secondary cooling loop. A seconary oil pick up would be connected to an auxilary oil pump which would circulate the oil through the cooler and return to the sump. The secondary loop could be run with a lower pressure and larger hoses to maintain an adequate flow rate, putting less internal force on the oil cooler. The normal engine connections for the oil cooler would be directly connected to each other to maintain oil flow in the engine. One downside might be the couple of extra pounds for the aux oil pump, but that sounds like a small price to pay. I appreciate anyone thoughts or comments. Joe (Still waiting for an engine mount.) >> Oil coolers operate for the life of the vehicles in millions of applications around the world. Aircraft installations require very carefull planning to avoid failure induced by vibration. The cooler with oil is heavy and must be soft mounted and protected against striking or rubbing any fixed item as the cooler responds to various harmonics. The hoses connecting the cooler must be light weight, and flexible, and the must not be clamped down tight close to the cooler. Everything forward of the firewall moves around. It shakes (low frequency) and vibrates (high frequency). If you soft mount the cooler (good) but tie the hoses to a close by item that moves around, the cooler will fail. A nice 90 degree turn in a soft flexible hose leaving the cooler is a good start to a long life. Even a soft hose becomes very stiff when pressurized to 85 PSI. A hose that is stiff with no pressure in it becomes an iron bar when pressurized to 85 PSI. The mounting tabs are for connecting the cooler to a rubber..........you fill in the blank. But only rubber. A (soft) standoff, A section of radiator hose, whatever, but not metal anything. Or, the tab and or, a piece of the cooler will break off. I have an electric oil pump on my race car that circulates trans oil through a cooler. Works great. The trans used to get so hot that the rear seal would loose it's press fit and fall out. No more. So it does work. A bit heavy, maybe 3 pounds, but it does work, and really hot oil dosn't bother it. Speedway engineering has them. The idea of cooling the oil outside of the pressurised oil system has possibilities. I would like to see a study of how much oil passes through the oil pressure relief valve once cruise RPM is reached. The oil is just dumped back into the pan and adds to oil foaming, which is a bad idea. Why not route that expended oil through a cooler and then back into the pan? No additional pump required. I think Peterson has external adjustable oil pressure relief valves, to the hook up would not be difficult. Lynn E. Hanover