Return-Path: <Lehanover@aol.com>
Received: from imo-d22.mx.aol.com ([205.188.144.208] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5)
  with ESMTP id 566452 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 20:26:41 -0500
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.144.208; envelope-from=Lehanover@aol.com
Received: from Lehanover@aol.com
	by imo-d22.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id q.bd.4cf60abd (4362)
	 for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 20:26:23 -0500 (EST)
From: Lehanover@aol.com
Message-ID: <bd.4cf60abd.2eef9b3f@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 20:26:23 EST
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Single rotor
To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 138

In a message dated 12/13/2004 6:59:04 PM Central Standard Time, 
marv@lancaironline.net writes:

<< Pretty cool.  How do you deal with the fact that you have 2 end gears with 
a 
 rotor that's only geared on one side?  (Probably a very simple answer, but I 
 had to ask...)
 
      <Marv> >>


I was thinking that there is room for the stationary gear teeth inside  the 
open side of the rotor. Even without cutting the gear teeth down some. If I get 
time I will dummy up a set and see if that is the case. The bearing runs to 
the end of the gear teeth and you wouldn't want to give up any bearing support.

Lynn E. Hanover