Return-Path: Received: from mail.viclink.com ([66.129.220.6] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 565288 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 08:10:54 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.129.220.6; envelope-from=pjmick@viclink.com Received: from viclink.com (p017.AS1.viclink.com [66.129.192.17]) by mail.viclink.com (8.11.7/8.11.7) with ESMTP id iBDDAA242021 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 05:10:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <41BD9441.1020406@viclink.com> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 05:08:17 -0800 From: Perry Mick User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: First Flight Too References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Yes, I'm sad to see it go too. I'm still getting used to this prop thing. And the safety aspects of having the fan buried are a big advantage. I'm keeping all the parts, and eventually will build a completely new cowl for the prop version. So if I want to sometime in the future, I can unbolt the prop stuff and bolt the ducted fan back on. DaveLeonard wrote: >Well Perry, part of me misses the ducted fan. I have always commended your >spirit in doing something totally different. I'm sad to see it go (was this >some sort of sneak maneuver so those of us who thought it was cool couldn't >talk you out of the change?). > >Looking forward to more flight data. > >David Leonard >The Rotary Roster >http://members.aol.com\_ht_a\rotaryroster\index.html > > >