Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.103] (HELO ms-smtp-04-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 562613 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:58:44 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.103; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-069-132-109-019.carolina.rr.com [69.132.109.19]) by ms-smtp-04-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id iBAJw9Ci003870 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:58:10 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <001801c4def2$94d0a490$2502a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] exhaust design question Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:58:12 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Well, interestingly enough, while out fixing fuel leaks (wasn't an injector after all) and getting the exhaust on, I noticed a Piper Arrow fixing to take off. So I grabbed my sound meter and took some reading. 25 ft from the tail of the Arrow at low rpm (idle) the meter read between 89 and 92 dB. On take off roll, standing abeam the Arrow and 40 ft from the center line I measure 107 db. So it appears its as much the nature of the Rotary "bark" as it is the sound level. I now have my static rpm back and the sound level is down over the previous muffler but not as much as when I had the 3 additional discs in the tubes. But, will fly with this one as the sound is down by 3-4db not as good as the 8 db down previously but some improvement. After going back to the drawing board and doing some calculations, its clear that my objective of low back pressure and low noise level can not be met by my 2" dia pipes. It will require a 3" dia tube which then requires reducer cones (to match up to my 2" headers) etc, which starts to get expensive for two 3" dia mufflers. It appears one route would be to merge my two separate exhaust into one header tube and use just one 3" dia tube. But then that would require building a new header. So just need to sit down and calculate the costs both ways. So sorry I can't offer any concrete suggestions on your 3 rotor, Kevin. Good luck Ed Anderson ----- Original Message ----- From: "kevin lane" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 12:27 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] exhaust design question > I am going to design my 20b exhaust, from plastic to start with. when > exhaust pipes join do they necessarily need to jump up in volume/dia.? the > exhaust is never flowing thru two at one time, correct? my welder, Tom, > with lots of race car experience, says that if I don't use a 3-to-1 > collector, and go to what he calls a log-type exhaust (with a plenum), that > the "log" should be of a larger diameter. the pics I see here for turbos at > least don't seem to follow that logic. the 3-1 design strikes me as > difficult, heavy, and expensive. Tom says that the bellows are expensive, > $120/ea, but wasn't sure how the log-type exhaust would handle the heat > stress with it's inherently short runs. The 3-1 works well for that because > of the extra flex in the design. > WWED? (what would Ed do?) (if only straight pipes would be acceptable!) > Kevin Lane Portland, OR > e-mail-> n3773@comcast.net > web-> http://home.comcast.net/~n3773 > (browse w/ internet explorer) > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dale Rogers" > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 4:18 AM > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: In-line Oil Filter - reprise > > > > > >> > >> From: Bulent Aliev > >> Date: 2004/12/10 Fri AM 06:51:08 EST > >> To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > >> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: In-line Oil Filter - reprise > >> > >> Looks very good Dale. You can put one or two sensor holes or PSRU oil > >> feed > >> port too? > >> Bulent > > > > Yes. In fact, that was my original intent - to make a > > block with bosses for temp and pressure sensors. This one > > just got finished first. > > > > I'm also working on another, larger, block that put the > > oil filter hanging down at 30* from level, instead of the > > current (nearly?) verticle. It, too, will have bosses > > drilled and tapped for sensors (or oil feed). > > > > Dale R. > > COZY MkIV #1254 > > > > > > > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >