Return-Path: Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net ([204.127.202.64] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 562508 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 12:30:28 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.202.64; envelope-from=n3773@comcast.net Received: from rv8 (c-24-21-140-241.client.comcast.net[24.21.140.241]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with SMTP id <20041210172958016008roepe>; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 17:29:58 +0000 Message-ID: <002201c4dedd$955830a0$f18c1518@rv8> Reply-To: "kevin lane" From: "kevin lane" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: exhaust design question Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 09:27:51 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 I am going to design my 20b exhaust, from plastic to start with. when exhaust pipes join do they necessarily need to jump up in volume/dia.? the exhaust is never flowing thru two at one time, correct? my welder, Tom, with lots of race car experience, says that if I don't use a 3-to-1 collector, and go to what he calls a log-type exhaust (with a plenum), that the "log" should be of a larger diameter. the pics I see here for turbos at least don't seem to follow that logic. the 3-1 design strikes me as difficult, heavy, and expensive. Tom says that the bellows are expensive, $120/ea, but wasn't sure how the log-type exhaust would handle the heat stress with it's inherently short runs. The 3-1 works well for that because of the extra flex in the design. WWED? (what would Ed do?) (if only straight pipes would be acceptable!) Kevin Lane Portland, OR e-mail-> n3773@comcast.net web-> http://home.comcast.net/~n3773 (browse w/ internet explorer) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dale Rogers" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 4:18 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: In-line Oil Filter - reprise > >> >> From: Bulent Aliev >> Date: 2004/12/10 Fri AM 06:51:08 EST >> To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" >> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: In-line Oil Filter - reprise >> >> Looks very good Dale. You can put one or two sensor holes or PSRU oil >> feed >> port too? >> Bulent > > Yes. In fact, that was my original intent - to make a > block with bosses for temp and pressure sensors. This one > just got finished first. > > I'm also working on another, larger, block that put the > oil filter hanging down at 30* from level, instead of the > current (nearly?) verticle. It, too, will have bosses > drilled and tapped for sensors (or oil feed). > > Dale R. > COZY MkIV #1254 > > > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html