Return-Path: Received: from [65.54.168.118] (HELO hotmail.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 549995 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:51:31 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.54.168.118; envelope-from=lors01@msn.com Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:51:01 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.98.150 by BAY3-DAV14.phx.gbl with DAV; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:50:18 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [65.54.98.150] X-Originating-Email: [lors01@msn.com] X-Sender: lors01@msn.com From: "Tracy Crook" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Another precautionary landing Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:47:40 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00D8_01C4D622.60290670" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: MSN 9 Seal-Send-Time: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:47:40 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By MSN MimeOLE V9.10.0009.2900 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Nov 2004 19:51:01.0300 (UTC) FILETIME=[C0C1C740:01C4D64C] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00D8_01C4D622.60290670 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message Also, didn't you fall for the old Mazda practical joke of using = the rear housing water temp sensor for oil temp? Was that just changed = while waiting for the new turbo? If so, all bets are off as to what he = temp used to be. =20 Correct again. But, the coolant AND oil temps are both rising much more = than they were before, and the ambient temp is 20 degrees cooler. = Perhaps the old gauges were off, but before installing the EM2 I did run = WOT for 1.5 hrs without apparently overheating anything or loosing any = coolant, so I think they were ok. Also, this seems to coincide with = strange engine / mixture behavior. Note that I had to richen the = mixture almost to the stop to keep it running, and that I turned off one = set of injectors to get it to smooth out. Could this be related somehow? = How many annoying failures can one guy have at a time??? John Must be specific with details. Did you turn off one set of injectors = before or after having to turn mixture control full rich? If it was before, I am not surprised (probably normal on your turbo = installation, full explanation would take longer than I have). If it = was after, I would be alarmed (something is terribly wrong but I can't = tell what with the available data). Tracy ------=_NextPart_000_00D8_01C4D622.60290670 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
 Also, didn't you fall for the = old Mazda=20 practical joke of using the rear housing water temp sensor for oil = temp? =20 Was that just changed while waiting for the new turbo?  If so, all = bets are=20 off as to what he temp used to = be.  
 
Correct again. = But, the=20 coolant AND oil temps are both rising much more than they were = before, and=20 the ambient temp is 20 degrees cooler. Perhaps the old gauges were off, = but=20 before installing the EM2 I did run WOT for 1.5 hrs without apparently=20 overheating anything or loosing any coolant, so I think they were=20 ok. Also, this seems to = coincide with=20 strange engine / mixture behavior.  Note that I had to richen the = mixture=20 almost to the stop to keep it running, and that I turned off one set of=20 injectors to get it to smooth out. Could this be related somehow? How = many=20 annoying failures can one guy have at a=20 time???
 
John
 
Must be specific with details.  Did you = turn off=20 one set of injectors before or after having to turn mixture control full = rich?
 
If it was before, I am not surprised = (probably=20 normal on your turbo installation, full explanation would take longer = than I=20 have).   If it was after, I would be alarmed (something = is=20 terribly wrong but I can't tell what with the available=20 data).
 
Tracy
<= /BODY> ------=_NextPart_000_00D8_01C4D622.60290670--