Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.102] (HELO ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 494005 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 07:39:11 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.102; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-069-132-109-019.carolina.rr.com [69.132.109.19]) by ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id iA1Ccckd015989 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2004 07:38:39 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <001a01c4c00f$beea3900$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: IFR currency was Re: [FlyRotary] Re: 3000 fpm :-) (unofficially) Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 07:38:52 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Go for it Dave, Didn't mean to imply that having an instrument rating was in any way a bad thing - so long as you stay current and don't let your skills erode then I would agree with your rationale. Ed Anderson ----- Original Message ----- From: "DaveLeonard" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 11:27 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: IFR currency was Re: [FlyRotary] Re: 3000 fpm :-) (unofficially) > I agree with you guys on one level. I never plan to intentionally fly into > icing-like conditions or around big imbedded towering cu. There is also > no-doubt a currency factor that should play a big role. > > But on the other hand, having the additional training will only be helpful > give your personal weather decisions. I have also spent my share of time in > inadvertent IMC where I was afraid to contact ATC for fear of getting in > trouble. Being legal, separated from other traffic, and better trained is > never a bad thing. > > I had been waiting on getting my ticket until my RV-6 was flying. Now it > is, so last week I took the written. First flight coming soon, practicing > on the computer. Bluemountain EIFS lite G3 paid for - to redundantize the > panel. (check out this newest bit of gear from an ex-rotor head. > www.bluemountainavionics.com ) > > Dave Leonard > > > > > > Steve, > > > > You made the point I felt about myself. If I weren't going to stay > > current (unlikely) then having the ticket just might be enough to tempt me > > to do something that could end up getting me killed. > > > > Lets' face it - by flying experimental aircraft with > > experimental engines > > we have already moved the risk factor up the scale a notch or two. I > > personally like to keep the other risk factors (within my control) on the > > lower side {:>) > > > > Ed > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Steve Brooks" > > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > > Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 10:04 PM > > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: 3000 fpm :-) (unofficially) > > > > > > > Ed, > > > Actually I have an instrument rating, but the guy who > > > had the Bonaza wasn't current, and I wouldn't want to > > > fly an unfamiliar aircraft in actual IMC. Especially > > > as bad as it was here 1-1/2 vis w/ 500 ft ceiling. > > > Not very good conditions, especially since I haven't > > > flown in actual IMC in 2 years. Not a good place to > > > pick back up. > > > > > > Steve Brooks > > > --- Ed Anderson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Bulent Aliev" > > > > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > > > > > > > > Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 4:58 PM > > > > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: 3000 fpm :-) (unofficially) > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/31/04 3:54 PM, "Ed Anderson" > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Steve, good to hear from you. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I always looked at the weather in SC just > > > > to see if I did get off > > > > what > > > > > > it would be like a bit further south. Generally > > > > the fog didn't start to > > > > > > lift until near the Georgia border. > > > > > > > > > > You guys have one year to get your instrument > > > > rating. Last year we had 6 > > > > > rotary powered airplanes. This year two? We are > > > > going backwards? > > > > > Fin is the only one with real coconuts to fly in > > > > even if the tower told > > > > him > > > > > it is IFR (or fly period :) It was a great > > > > gathering as usual and we thank > > > > > Tracy and Laura for the hospitality and Laura's > > > > parents for landing them > > > > > their beautiful house. > > > > > Bulent > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ah! I see we are now using Finn's coconuts as the > > > > standard- are we?. Well, > > > > this old ape is content to let the young ones with > > > > the big coconuts fly in > > > > that kind of weather. Probably why you only see > > > > small coconuts on old apes > > > > {:>) > > > > > > > > Two winters ago I stupidly got myself in situation > > > > (clear Wx was being > > > > reported behind a cold front) flying at 8000 ft and > > > > trying to go over the > > > > tops of a "few clouds". I ended up spending 15-20 > > > > minutes in solid IFR and > > > > ice. Ice formed on the canopy and in front of each > > > > fuel cap on the wing. > > > > Fortunately had pitot heat and remembered to turn it > > > > on before it was too > > > > late. yes, I did the 180 thing but the weather had > > > > build up behind me > > > > quickly. > > > > > > > > Staying on the AI, altimeter and GPS, I was finally > > > > able to get down and > > > > below the weather at 1800 MSL. I finally landed > > > > minus radio antenna (that > > > > the ice took off) just north of Atlanta. The > > > > first thing I saw when I > > > > staggered into the FBO's office through the blowing > > > > snow was an article > > > > posted to their reading board about the average time > > > > a non-instrument rated > > > > pilot lasted in IFR conditions was a few seconds > > > > short of 3 minutes. The > > > > experience and the article was enough to shrink any > > > > oversized coconuts > > > > this old ape may have had. {:>) > > > > > > > > My plane is instrumented for IFR (fortunately) and I > > > > actually completed the > > > > instrument ground school and passed the FAA ground > > > > test just before I > > > > retired. I then decided that there was probably > > > > risk in me completing an > > > > obtaining an IFR rating. If you don't stay current > > > > - I think you are > > > > fooling yourself and just might end up in a > > > > situation beyond your current > > > > capabilities. > > > > > > > > Sorry, I didn't make it and missed seeing all you > > > > folks that did, but hope > > > > to make it next year. Now if Tracy got a GPS > > > > approach for Shady Bend {:>) > > > > > > > > Best Regards > > > > > > > > Ed Anderson. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > > > > >> Archive: > > > > http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > > > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > > > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >